Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Establishes a sunset provision for the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress.
The problem
The Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress operates without a defined end date, potentially continuing indefinitely without periodic review of its necessity and effectiveness.
The proposal
The bill sets an expiration date for the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress, requiring Congress to actively reauthorize it if it wants the committee to continue operating.
The impact
Congressional staff and the committee itself must plan for potential cessation. Congress must decide whether to renew the committee's authority or allow it to end.
Sunset provisions force Congress to periodically evaluate whether a committee still serves a useful purpose. This prevents outdated or ineffective bodies from continuing indefinitely.
By requiring active reauthorization, Congress must justify the committee's continued existence and funding. This promotes transparency and responsible government spending.
Sunset provisions allow Congress to modify or eliminate committees without lengthy legislative processes. This makes government structures more adaptable to changing needs.
If the committee expires and Congress delays reauthorization, work on congressional records management could be interrupted. This creates uncertainty for ongoing projects.
Requiring periodic reauthorization adds legislative work and committee time. Congress must repeatedly revisit the decision instead of focusing on other priorities.
If the committee is not reauthorized, expertise and relationships built around congressional records management could be lost. Rebuilding such capabilities takes time and resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.