Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires transparency about how artificial intelligence affects workers and jobs.
The problem
Artificial intelligence is changing workplaces rapidly. Workers, employers, and policymakers lack clear information about job impacts and how to prepare for these changes.
The proposal
The bill mandates reporting and disclosure requirements about AI's effects on employment, job skills needed, and worker transitions. It aims to create clarity through standardized information sharing.
The impact
Workers gain information about job changes. Employers must report AI impacts. Policymakers get data to guide workforce policies. Training programs can better prepare people for new jobs.
People can understand how AI might affect their jobs and plan ahead. This helps workers decide whether to learn new skills or change careers before layoffs happen.
Schools and training centers will know which skills are in demand. They can create programs that actually prepare people for real jobs that will exist in the AI economy.
Policymakers will have real data about job losses and new opportunities. This helps governments create better support programs and economic policies for affected communities.
With clear information about coming changes, workers can transition to new jobs more successfully instead of being surprised by sudden job losses.
Companies must spend time and money gathering and reporting AI impact data. Small businesses might struggle more than large corporations with these new requirements and compliance costs.
Requiring companies to report details about their AI use could reveal business secrets. Competitors might gain unfair advantages from learning about company strategies and technology investments.
Transparency alone doesn't stop AI from replacing workers. The bill informs people about changes but doesn't require companies to prevent layoffs or create new jobs.
Without clear definitions of what counts as AI impact or how to measure it, companies might report inconsistent information. Workers might still be confused about real job risks.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.