Latest action: Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses voting system security and protection measures for election integrity.
The problem
Voting systems face security vulnerabilities and threats that could affect election reliability and public confidence in democratic processes.
The proposal
Establishes protections for voting systems through security standards, requirements, and oversight mechanisms across state and local election administration.
The impact
Election officials, voters, and election security personnel will need to implement new voting system standards and security protocols.
Stronger protections for voting systems could reduce vulnerabilities to cyber attacks and tampering. This may increase public confidence that votes are counted accurately and securely.
Uniform security standards across states could eliminate gaps where some jurisdictions have weaker defenses. Consistent requirements make it harder for threats to exploit regional differences.
Improved security could protect against foreign and domestic interference in voting systems. This safeguards the integrity of election results.
States and local election offices may face significant expenses upgrading voting equipment and hiring security personnel. Smaller jurisdictions could struggle with budget constraints.
New requirements could create extra work for election officials already managing complex voting processes. Compliance deadlines might strain resources in under-staffed offices.
Voting system upgrades and security compliance could cause logistical challenges during election cycles. Rushed implementation might create new problems.
Stricter security measures could unintentionally make voting more complicated for some voters. Concerns about new technologies might arise among certain communities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.