Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Establishes security standards and oversight for artificial intelligence development and deployment.
The problem
AI systems are developing rapidly with limited safety standards or government oversight, raising concerns about security risks, misuse, and potential harms.
The proposal
The bill creates regulations requiring AI developers to implement security measures, report risks, and comply with government safety standards.
The impact
AI companies must follow new rules. Users may get safer AI systems. Technology companies face compliance costs and possible operational delays.
Requires developers to build security safeguards into AI systems before release. Helps prevent dangerous AI from being deployed without proper testing.
Establishes standards to reduce risks from AI misuse like fraud or misinformation. Gives users more confidence that AI systems meet safety requirements.
Sets rules that let American companies compete globally while meeting safety standards. Establishes America as a responsible AI leader internationally.
Provides AI developers with specific requirements to follow. Reduces confusion about what safety practices are expected.
Smaller companies may struggle affording expensive security upgrades and reporting systems. Could reduce competition and favor large tech companies with more resources.
New regulations and approval processes might delay beneficial AI applications reaching the public. Medical and scientific advances could take longer.
Government oversight of technology could stifle innovation if rules are too strict. Might restrict legitimate research and development activities.
Other countries without similar rules might develop AI faster. Could disadvantage American companies competing globally if standards are stricter here.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.