Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Remove Senate approval requirement for DC federal judges.
The problem
Currently DC federal judges need Senate approval for appointments. This process can be slow and politically contentious. The bill seeks to streamline judicial appointments to DC courts.
The proposal
Amends DC Home Rule Act to allow judges appointed automatically without Senate confirmation. Changes appointment process for District of Columbia courts.
The impact
Affects DC residents' judicial system, federal judges, Senate authority, and how DC courts operate. Changes who has power over selecting judges.
Removes delays from Senate confirmation process. DC could fill vacant judgeships more quickly. Courts could operate with full staffing sooner.
Gives DC more control over its own court system. Reduces federal Senate power over local DC courts. Treats DC more like other states in judicial matters.
Removes judicial appointments from Senate partisan battles. Takes judges out of political confirmation fights. May reduce political delays on court decisions.
Senate loses ability to review judge qualifications. Eliminates public hearings and vetting process. Reduces checks and balances on appointments.
No federal approval means less oversight of judges. Raises questions about qualification standards. May reduce transparency in selection process.
Current system requires Senate advice and consent for federal judges. This bill changes that requirement significantly. May face legal challenges over federal authority.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.