Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
The bill addresses how artificial intelligence systems use data for training and development.
The problem
AI companies collect and use large amounts of data to train systems, but there are concerns about data privacy, transparency, and whether people know how their information is being used.
The proposal
The bill would likely establish rules for how AI developers access, use, and manage data in creating artificial intelligence models and systems.
The impact
Tech companies, AI developers, data users, and individuals whose data may be used in AI training could be affected through new requirements or restrictions.
Clear rules about data usage could protect people's personal information from being used without their knowledge. This gives individuals more control over their own data.
Requirements could force AI companies to explain how they use data. This helps people and regulators understand what's happening with AI systems.
Standard rules apply to all AI companies equally, preventing larger companies from gaining unfair advantages through data access.
Clear regulations could increase public confidence in AI technology by showing that protections are in place.
Strict data rules might make it harder or more expensive for AI companies to develop new systems. This could slow technological progress.
Companies would need to hire compliance staff and change operations to follow new regulations, increasing business expenses.
New regulations could be confusing and create conflicting rules with other state or federal laws about data and AI.
Strict U.S. rules might disadvantage American AI companies competing against companies in countries with fewer restrictions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.