Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Settles water rights disputes between the Zuni Indian Tribe and the federal government.
The problem
The Zuni Indian Tribe has unresolved water rights claims. This creates legal uncertainty for the tribe, nearby communities, and water management in the region.
The proposal
The bill establishes a formal settlement of the Zuni Tribe's water rights, defining allocations and resolving long-standing disputes with federal and state authorities.
The impact
Affects the Zuni Tribe, neighboring water users, New Mexico, and southwestern water management. Provides certainty for agriculture, ranching, and tribal resources.
Ends decades of legal disputes over water rights. Provides clarity for the Zuni Tribe to plan economic development and resource management confidently.
Recognizes and protects the Zuni Tribe's water allocation rights. Strengthens tribal self-determination and decision-making over reservation resources.
Establishes clear water allocation agreements between parties. Reduces future litigation and creates predictability for agricultural and community water needs.
Secure water rights allow the tribe to invest in agriculture, infrastructure, and economic projects. Supports job creation and improved living conditions.
Allocating water to the Zuni Tribe could reduce availability for neighboring states or communities. Non-tribal water users might face restrictions or higher costs.
Settlement may require federal funding for infrastructure, enforcement, or remediation. This creates government spending obligations.
Settlements require detailed coordination between tribe, federal agencies, and state authorities. Enforcement and monitoring mechanisms may be complicated and costly.
This settlement could establish expectations for other tribal water rights settlements. May lead to increased claims from other tribes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.