Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Removes special legal protections for people violating state laws.
The problem
Some individuals or groups may receive special immunity from state law enforcement. This bill addresses concerns about unequal treatment under the law.
The proposal
Eliminates special legal immunities that allow certain people to violate state laws without facing the same consequences as others.
The impact
Federal employees, officials, and possibly other groups could face state prosecution. State enforcement power increases. Legal protections may be reduced for specific populations.
Everyone would face the same state law consequences regardless of status. This promotes fairness and equal justice. No group receives special exemptions.
States gain more power to prosecute crimes within their borders. State governments can hold more people accountable. This supports state sovereignty.
Special immunities may seem like unfair advantages. Removing them could increase public trust in legal systems. It eliminates perception of two-tiered justice.
Federal employees and officials could face numerous state prosecutions. This may interfere with federal duties and functions. It creates legal uncertainty for federal workers.
Federal officials following federal law might violate state law. State prosecutions could contradict federal authority. This creates legal chaos and confusion.
States could weaponize prosecution against federal officials. Small states could disrupt federal operations through harassment charges. The balance between state and federal power shifts dramatically.
Some immunities protect people performing official duties. Removing them entirely may prevent legitimate government functions. Critical protections could be eliminated without clear alternatives.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.