Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes constitutional amendment to deny automatic citizenship to children born to non-citizens in the US.
The problem
Current interpretation of the 14th Amendment grants citizenship to almost all children born on US soil, regardless of parents' immigration status. Some argue this creates incentives for illegal immigration.
The proposal
Amends the 14th Amendment to clarify that automatic birthright citizenship does not apply to children born to non-citizen parents, unless at least one parent is a citizen.
The impact
Would potentially affect millions of children born to undocumented or non-citizen parents. Could create stateless individuals and alter citizenship policies for future generations.
Supporters argue removing birthright citizenship for non-citizen children removes an incentive for illegal border crossing. They believe it strengthens immigration law enforcement and border security priorities.
Proponents argue the 14th Amendment was not meant to grant citizenship to children of temporary visitors or undocumented residents. They contend this clarifies original intent.
Supporters claim that denying automatic citizenship could reduce social services usage and healthcare costs for children of non-citizens. They argue resources could be redirected to citizens.
Children born to non-citizen parents could become stateless if they cannot claim their parents' nationality. This violates international conventions and creates legal limbo for vulnerable minors.
Courts have consistently interpreted the 14th Amendment as granting birthright citizenship to all born on US soil. This amendment would reverse well-established legal precedent and create uncertainty.
Government would need to verify parental citizenship status at birth for millions of births annually. This creates administrative burden, privacy concerns, and potential discrimination in hospitals.
Children born to mixed-status parents (one citizen, one non-citizen) could face legal complications and discrimination. Sibling citizenship differences could create family hardship and emotional harm.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.