Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Provides support and resources to young people aging out of the foster care system.
The problem
Foster youth who turn 18 often lack housing, education, and job skills. They face homelessness, poverty, and struggle without family support that other young adults have.
The proposal
Bill would offer foster youth extended services including housing assistance, job training, education support, and mentoring programs to help them transition to independent adulthood.
The impact
Foster youth ages 18-21 would receive government assistance. Taxpayers would fund new programs. Social workers and service providers would implement expanded services.
Young people leaving foster care have high homelessness rates. Housing assistance could prevent youth from living on streets and stabilize their lives. This helps them pursue education and employment.
Job training and education support help former foster youth become employed and self-sufficient. This reduces long-term government dependency and increases tax revenue as adults earn more.
Stable housing and support services improve mental and physical health for vulnerable young adults. Mentoring provides guidance and reduces risky behaviors and substance abuse.
Education support helps former foster youth attend college and gain skills. Higher education leads to better career opportunities and stronger futures.
New programs require federal funding, increasing the budget deficit or requiring higher taxes. The exact cost depends on program size and eligibility requirements not yet detailed.
Supporting youth only until age 21 may leave them vulnerable afterward. Some may still struggle financially and emotionally beyond that age cutoff.
States and service agencies must develop and staff new programs quickly. Quality and effectiveness may vary by location, leaving some youth better served than others.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.