Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reform military duty status definitions and requirements.
The problem
Current military duty status rules may be unclear or outdated. This affects how service members are classified and what benefits they receive.
The proposal
Bill would change how the military defines and assigns duty status to service members. Specific changes unknown pending committee review and official summary.
The impact
Service members, military families, and Department of Defense operations. Changes could affect pay, benefits, deployment rules, and career advancement.
Clearer duty status definitions could reduce confusion for service members and military leaders. This might help with fair treatment and consistent policy application across the military.
Updating outdated rules could better reflect how the military actually operates today. New duty categories might address gaps in current law.
Better definitions could ensure service members receive correct pay and benefits. This might fix cases where current rules don't match real duty situations.
Without details, it's unclear what changes the bill makes. Service members and families can't evaluate how it affects them.
Changes to duty status rules could increase military spending. New classifications might require higher pay or benefits in some cases.
Changing duty status rules requires training and system updates across the military. This could be complicated and take time to fully apply.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.