Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to expand insurance coverage for prescription digital therapeutics treatments.
The problem
Digital therapeutics are software-based medical treatments, but insurance often does not cover them like traditional medicines, limiting patient access to these newer options.
The proposal
The bill would require health insurance plans to cover prescription digital therapeutics as they would regular prescription medications.
The impact
Patients would gain easier access to digital therapies. Insurance companies and healthcare providers would need to adjust coverage policies. Healthcare costs may shift.
Patients could access digital therapy treatments without high out-of-pocket costs. This could help people who benefit from apps and software-based treatments for conditions like anxiety, addiction, or chronic pain.
Digital therapeutics represent newer medical technology. Covering them encourages innovation in healthcare and gives doctors more tools to treat patients effectively.
Some digital therapies may cost less than traditional medications or treatments long-term. Insurance coverage could reduce overall healthcare spending in certain cases.
Treating digital medicines the same as traditional medicines creates fairness. Patients get equal access regardless of treatment type.
Requiring coverage for new treatments could raise insurance premiums for everyone. Insurance companies may pass costs to customers and employers.
Not all digital therapeutics have strong scientific evidence. Covering treatments before they are fully proven could waste insurance money on ineffective options.
Digital therapeutics are newer and regulations are still developing. Coverage requirements might be implemented before standards are clear, causing confusion.
Coverage requirements help insured people but do not help uninsured patients. It does not solve the broader access problem for everyone.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.