Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Improves mentorship programs for students studying science, technology, engineering, and math in college.
The problem
Many college students in STEM fields lack access to quality mentorship. This can hurt their academic success and career preparation in these important fields.
The proposal
The bill establishes or strengthens mentorship initiatives in STEM higher education programs. It likely provides funding, guidance, or requirements for colleges to create better mentor connections.
The impact
College STEM students gain mentors. Professors and institutions must participate. Funding may come from federal sources. The science workforce could be strengthened long-term.
Mentorship helps students understand difficult material and stay motivated. Students with mentors graduate more often and are better prepared for jobs.
The United States needs more workers in science and technology fields. Good mentorship encourages students to stay in STEM careers.
Mentorship can help students from groups underrepresented in STEM feel more supported and confident. This increases diversity in science fields.
Well-trained STEM graduates lead to more research, discoveries, and new technologies that benefit society and the economy.
The bill likely costs taxpayer money to fund mentorship programs and staff. This increases the federal budget.
Colleges must find time and resources to create good mentorship programs. This adds work for professors and administrators.
It is hard to measure if mentorship programs actually work or if the money is spent well. Results may vary between schools.
Not all students may have equal access to mentors. Some schools might struggle to create quality programs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.