Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes leadership and coordination for broadband internet expansion across the United States.
The problem
Many Americans lack reliable high-speed internet access. Current broadband efforts lack coordinated leadership and clear national strategy.
The proposal
Creates a leadership structure to coordinate broadband deployment, set standards, and guide national internet expansion efforts.
The impact
Rural and underserved communities may gain better internet access. Telecommunications companies and government agencies coordinate on deployment.
A coordinated approach could help bring high-speed internet to rural and underserved areas faster. Communities without reliable broadband could benefit from focused federal leadership and resources.
Improved broadband access enables businesses to start and grow in rural areas. Better internet supports education, telemedicine, and remote work opportunities.
Coordinated leadership can prevent multiple agencies from duplicating broadband efforts. This may save taxpayer money and improve efficiency.
Unified leadership can establish consistent broadband quality standards nationwide. This helps ensure all Americans receive comparable service levels.
Creating new federal leadership positions adds bureaucracy and costs. Taxpayers may pay for additional administrators and staff.
Government-led coordination might discourage private companies from investing in broadband. Businesses may wait for government guidance instead of acting independently.
Coordinating between federal agencies, states, and private companies is complex. Disagreements over priorities and methods could slow progress.
Without an official summary, the bill's specific requirements and powers are unclear. Implementation details could significantly affect costs and effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.