Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill proposes to eliminate the Anti-Weaponization Fund.
The problem
The Anti-Weaponization Fund exists but supporters believe it is unnecessary or ineffective for government operations.
The proposal
This bill would abolish the Anti-Weaponization Fund, removing it from federal operations and programs.
The impact
Federal agencies that use this fund would lose its resources. Taxpayers and program beneficiaries could be affected depending on fund purposes.
Eliminating the fund could reduce federal spending and the budget deficit. This appeals to those who want smaller government.
If the fund is ineffective or duplicates other programs, eliminating it eliminates waste. This streamlines government operations.
Fewer government funds means simpler, easier-to-understand federal operations. This could improve government efficiency.
If the fund provides legitimate safety or security functions, eliminating it removes those protections. This could harm affected communities.
Abolishing the fund could eliminate jobs and services it funds. Workers and beneficiaries would lose income and support.
Without an official summary, the bill's actual effects are unclear. Congress and the public cannot fully evaluate the consequences.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.