Latest action: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 48. Record Vote Number: 173. (consideration: CR S2816)
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Timothy Kaine (D-VA)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Congress votes to reject a rule about how immigration appeals are handled.
The problem
The Executive Office for Immigration Review created new rules for how the Board of Immigration Appeals handles cases. Some lawmakers oppose these rules.
The proposal
This resolution disapproves of the appellate procedures rule under a fast-track congressional process. If passed, it would cancel the rule.
The impact
Immigration judges, asylum seekers, and legal representatives would be affected by either keeping or removing these appeal procedures.
Rejecting the rule keeps the current system in place that people already understand. This avoids confusion from new procedures.
This process lets Congress review and reject rules they think are problematic. It is a check on executive branch power.
Using this special congressional process allows a quick vote without lengthy debates. Decisions happen faster than normal.
The new rule might have improved how appeals work. Rejecting it prevents any improvements from being used.
If Congress rejects rules frequently, agencies cannot plan or implement changes. This creates confusion in the system.
The immigration courts need to adapt to changing situations. Blocking rules reduces the ability to update procedures.
Appeals procedures affect how long immigrants wait for decisions. Changes could have helped move cases faster.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.