Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes a legal right for people to record police and public officials performing their duties.
The problem
People face legal uncertainty about whether they can record police interactions. Some jurisdictions restrict recording, preventing documentation of law enforcement conduct.
The proposal
Creates a federal right to record police and public officials acting in their official capacity in public spaces without legal penalty.
The impact
Police, citizens, and public officials are affected. Citizens gain clearer recording rights. Law enforcement practices may face increased documentation and scrutiny.
Video recordings can document police conduct, ensuring accountability. Citizens gain evidence for complaints and investigations. This transparency may reduce misconduct.
Citizens currently face confusion about recording laws across states. A federal standard removes uncertainty and protects people from wrongful arrest.
Recordings provide objective evidence for court cases. This can help prove innocence or guilt based on actual events, not just testimony.
Transparent documentation of police work can increase community confidence. Clear rules benefit both police and citizens who follow the law.
Officers may face harassment or threats when constantly recorded. Edited or misleading videos could damage reputations unfairly. This could impact recruitment and morale.
Police need to manage ongoing investigations, witness protection, and tactical operations. Recording could compromise undercover work or endanger informants.
Recordings may capture innocent bystanders, crime victims, or private information. Managing and storing recordings creates data security challenges and privacy risks.
Police departments must train officers, establish policies, and handle legal disputes. Technology and storage systems require funding police budgets may lack.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.