Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates accountability measures for US Postal Service delivery performance and standards.
The problem
Public concerns about mail delivery reliability, speed, and service quality. Need for oversight of postal operations and performance standards.
The proposal
Establishes accountability requirements for USPS delivery performance, metrics tracking, and reporting procedures to improve service standards.
The impact
Affects postal workers, mail recipients, businesses relying on mail, and USPS operations through new performance standards and oversight requirements.
Clear performance standards could improve mail delivery reliability. Tracking metrics helps identify and fix service problems. Customers get transparency on postal service quality.
Performance data helps identify inefficiencies and waste. Better tracking enables smarter resource allocation. Taxpayers get clearer information about USPS spending.
Accountability measures increase government transparency. Regular reporting builds confidence in postal service. Citizens see concrete efforts to improve operations.
New reporting systems and tracking infrastructure require spending. Compliance expenses may strain USPS budget. Could divert resources from actual mail delivery.
Strict performance metrics may increase pressure on postal workers. Could impact working conditions and employee morale. Incentive structures might prioritize speed over service quality.
Rural and remote areas face natural delivery challenges. Geographic and weather factors limit performance control. Rigid standards may be unfair to all regions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.