Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands the State Department's program for training diplomats through consular fellowships.
The problem
The State Department needs more trained personnel for consular and diplomatic work. Current fellowship programs may not produce enough qualified candidates for foreign service positions.
The proposal
The bill expands the Consular Fellows program, likely increasing funding, positions, or eligibility for people wanting to work in U.S. embassies and consulates abroad.
The impact
State Department staff, aspiring diplomats, and Americans seeking consular services are affected. More fellows means more trained diplomats and potentially better service at embassies worldwide.
Expanding the fellowship program creates more opportunities to train professionals for diplomatic work. This helps the State Department have enough qualified staff to represent America overseas.
More fellowship positions give Americans more chances to start careers in foreign service. This opens doors for people interested in diplomacy and international relations.
With more trained staff, U.S. embassies and consulates may provide better services to Americans abroad. This includes help with passports, visas, and emergency assistance.
More diplomats help the U.S. build better relationships with other countries. This can improve trade, security, and cooperation on global issues.
Expanding the program costs taxpayer money for salaries, training, and administration. The bill's fiscal impact depends on how many new positions are created.
Without seeing the full bill text, it's unclear how much money is needed or how many new positions would be created. This makes it hard to assess the true cost.
More fellows entering the system could make it harder for current applicants to get positions. This might create more competition without guaranteed jobs for all graduates.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.