Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S4701-4703)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates new federal measures to identify, prevent, and address domestic terrorism threats.
The problem
Federal government lacks unified approach to track and prevent domestic terrorism. Agencies may not share information effectively about extremist groups targeting Americans.
The proposal
Establishes domestic terrorism task force, requires interagency coordination, creates database for tracking domestic extremist activities, authorizes new prevention programs.
The impact
Law enforcement gains new tools; civil liberties advocates worry about monitoring; communities affected by extremism may see increased intervention.
Requires FBI, DHS, and other agencies to share information about threats. This could help prevent attacks by ensuring no agency works in isolation. Better communication saves lives.
New tracking systems and task forces might identify dangerous individuals before they act. Early intervention could stop terrorist attacks before people get hurt.
Dedicates resources to a serious national problem. Shows government commitment to protecting citizens from domestic threats.
Creates uniform standards across states instead of patchwork policies. Ensures equal protection regardless of where threats occur.
Expanded surveillance and databases could monitor people for speech or beliefs. Risk of targeting groups based on religion, politics, or identity rather than actual threats. History shows such programs sometimes abuse these powers.
What counts as 'domestic terrorism' can be unclear and subjective. This vagueness could lead to over-prosecution or targeting of lawful protesters and activists.
New task forces and databases require taxpayer funding. Unclear how effective these programs will be or if money could be spent better elsewhere.
Law enforcement might use these tools unfairly against minority communities or political opponents. Past surveillance programs have disproportionately targeted certain groups.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.