Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to limit improper use of subpoenas in legal proceedings and investigations.
The problem
Subpoenas may be issued without proper legal basis, harming individuals and businesses through excessive legal demands and disruptions.
The proposal
Establishes safeguards requiring courts to review subpoena requests before they are issued to ensure they serve legitimate legal purposes.
The impact
Affects lawyers, courts, witnesses, businesses, and people being investigated by limiting questionable subpoenas and reducing frivolous legal demands.
Prevents people from being repeatedly subpoenaed without good reason. Limits unnecessary disruptions to daily life and work from legal demands.
Companies waste time and money responding to questionable subpoenas. Stronger protections allow businesses to focus on operations instead of unnecessary legal demands.
Courts waste resources processing invalid subpoenas. Filtering improper requests frees up judges and staff to handle legitimate cases faster.
Stops lawyers or officials from using subpoenas as weapons to harm opponents. Creates accountability for misusing court power.
Extra court reviews could delay valid subpoenas in criminal and civil cases. Investigators might need more time to get necessary evidence and documents.
Unclear standards for what counts as abuse may lead to disputes and confusion. Lawyers and courts may disagree on whether subpoenas should be allowed.
Judges must review subpoena requests before approval. This adds new responsibilities and could strain already busy court systems.
Stricter rules could prevent legitimate evidence gathering in criminal cases. Guilty parties might escape justice if key evidence cannot be obtained.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.