Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows active-duty service members to carry concealed guns nationwide.
The problem
Active-duty military members face varying state gun laws when traveling. Some states restrict concealed carry permits from other states, creating legal confusion.
The proposal
Establishes federal reciprocity allowing armed forces members to carry concealed weapons across all states regardless of state laws.
The impact
Active-duty military personnel gain uniform gun rights nationwide. States lose control over concealed carry standards within their borders.
Active-duty military would have consistent gun rights everywhere. Service members wouldn't need to learn different rules in each state. This simplifies legal compliance during deployments and travel.
Armed forces members could defend themselves in any location. This may increase personal safety during civilian activities and travel.
One federal standard replaces complex state-by-state regulations. This reduces legal uncertainty for military personnel.
States lose power to set their own concealed carry rules. Federal override of state law limits local democratic control. This conflicts with states' traditional authority over firearms.
Stricter state standards become less effective if overridden. Some worry more concealed guns increase accidental incidents or crime. Lower-standard states' rules would apply everywhere.
States cannot verify service member status easily during traffic stops. Local law enforcement may face confusion enforcing federal standards. Determining who qualifies becomes administratively complex.
The phrase 'certain members' leaves definition unclear. It's unknown if this covers reserves, National Guard, or all service branches. Vague standards create legal uncertainty.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.