Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 14.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Bill allows more grazing on federal grasslands with simplified permits and reduced environmental reviews.
The problem
Ranchers say federal grazing rules are too strict and costly. They want easier access to public lands for livestock at lower fees and less red tape.
The proposal
The bill streamlines grazing permits on federal grasslands, reduces environmental review requirements, and may lower grazing fees or change permit terms for ranchers.
The impact
Ranchers gain easier land access; environmentalists worry about habitat damage; taxpayers may lose revenue; rural communities could benefit economically from expanded ranching.
Ranchers face lower costs and simpler paperwork. Smaller family farms may survive better with easier federal land access. Rural communities get economic support.
Streamlined permits mean less time and money spent on paperwork and reviews. Ranchers can operate faster without lengthy environmental assessments.
Gives ranchers and local communities more say in how grasslands are used instead of distant federal agencies making all decisions.
Increased grazing can damage grassland ecosystems, harm wildlife habitats, and reduce plant diversity. Prairie species and migratory birds could suffer.
Taxpayers own these grasslands. Reduced environmental reviews and lower fees mean less public benefit and potential long-term ecological damage to shared resources.
Less environmental oversight may increase livestock grazing impacts on grassland carbon storage and climate resilience. Scientific monitoring could be weakened.
Government may collect less money from grazing fees, reducing funds for land maintenance, conservation, and public services.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.