Latest action: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Kelly Morrison (D-MN)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Reauthorizes federal funding for newborn screening programs to detect serious health conditions early.
The problem
Newborn screening programs that test babies for serious diseases need renewed federal funding and support to continue operating effectively across states.
The proposal
The bill extends authorization and funding for existing newborn screening programs, allowing continued testing of newborns for treatable conditions.
The impact
Newborns, families, and state health programs benefit from continued disease detection and early treatment services.
Newborn screening catches serious conditions like sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis early when treatment is most effective. This can prevent disability, developmental delays, and death in infants.
Detecting diseases early through screening is cheaper than treating complications later. It prevents emergency hospitalizations and lifelong care costs that strain families and healthcare systems.
Federal funding helps states maintain and improve screening labs and infrastructure. This ensures consistent, quality testing across all states regardless of local budgets.
Low-income families benefit most from free screening programs. Early detection removes barriers to care for babies who might otherwise go undiagnosed.
The reauthorization increases federal budget spending on health programs. This adds to overall government expenditures during a time of budget constraints.
Without an official summary, it's unclear exactly how much funding is authorized, what specific changes are made, or if there are new requirements for states.
States may implement screening differently or inconsistently. Some families might have access to comprehensive testing while others receive minimal screening.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.