Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to increase pay and support for school paraprofessionals and support staff.
The problem
School paraprofessionals and support staff often earn low wages despite important roles in education, leading to high turnover and recruitment difficulties.
The proposal
The bill aims to improve compensation and benefits for paraprofessionals and support staff working in schools, though specific mechanisms are not yet detailed.
The impact
School paraprofessionals, support staff, school districts, and students would be affected through potential wage increases and improved retention of experienced staff.
Higher pay can reduce turnover among paraprofessionals and support staff. This keeps experienced workers in schools, benefiting students through continuity and stability.
Better compensation recognizes the value of support staff roles in schools. This can boost morale and job satisfaction among these workers.
Paraprofessionals and support staff handle critical functions like tutoring, counseling, and maintenance. Better pay helps ensure these essential services run smoothly.
Lower staff turnover means schools spend less on hiring and training new employees. Schools can redirect savings to other educational needs.
Higher wages for paraprofessionals and support staff increase district budgets. Schools may need more funding or must cut other programs to pay for this.
It is unknown how the bill would fund these wage increases. Federal funding, local taxes, or state budgets could all be affected.
Different regions and districts have different budgets and wage structures. A single bill may not work fairly for all schools nationwide.
The bill summary lacks specific details about wage increases or implementation. Without these details, full impact cannot yet be assessed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.