Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 527.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Reauthorizes federal nursing workforce programs to increase nurse education and training.
The problem
The U.S. faces a nursing shortage affecting healthcare access. More nurses are needed in underserved areas. Nursing education programs need sustained federal funding.
The proposal
Extends federal Title VIII nursing programs that fund scholarships, training grants, and workforce development. Updates nursing education requirements and support mechanisms.
The impact
Nursing students, hospitals, healthcare facilities, and underserved communities benefit. Schools of nursing receive funding. Healthcare access improves in shortage areas.
Federal funding helps more students attend nursing school. More nurses graduate and enter the workforce. This reduces nursing shortages in hospitals and clinics.
Programs can direct nurses to underserved rural and urban areas. Communities lacking healthcare providers benefit. Patient care improves in shortage regions.
Funding supports nursing schools and training programs. Schools can expand capacity and improve facilities. New nurses receive quality education.
Scholarships and grants help nursing students afford education. Graduates enter the workforce with less debt. More people can afford nursing careers.
Reauthorization requires federal spending for scholarships and grants. Taxpayers fund the program. Other federal priorities may compete for resources.
No official summary available makes it hard to assess specific changes. The bill's exact provisions are unclear. Full impact cannot be determined.
More nursing graduates may not solve specific shortage areas. Nurses may not go where most needed. Some regions could still lack staff.
Getting more nurses to underserved areas remains difficult. Loans and grants alone may not attract nurses. Retention in hard-to-serve areas stays problematic.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.