Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to increase access to lung cancer screening for Americans at risk.
The problem
Many people at risk for lung cancer don't get screening tests early. Early detection saves lives but screening isn't always available or affordable.
The proposal
Bill likely expands lung cancer screening access through insurance coverage, funding, or provider programs. Specific mechanisms unclear without full text.
The impact
Patients at risk, insurance companies, healthcare providers, and taxpayers. Could increase early cancer detection and treatment costs.
Lung cancer caught early is more treatable and survival rates improve. Screening can find cancer before symptoms appear when treatment works best.
Increased screening access leads to more diagnoses early, reducing death rates. Better outcomes reduce long-term healthcare costs from advanced-stage treatment.
Preventing advanced cancer reduces emergency room visits and hospital stays. This frees resources for other patients and emergencies.
Smokers and former smokers often lack access to screening. Bill may help low-income and underserved communities get preventive care.
Screening may show abnormalities that aren't cancer, causing unnecessary worry. Follow-up tests and procedures can be expensive and stressful.
Insurance companies may pass screening costs to customers through higher premiums. People already struggling with costs face even bigger bills.
Expanding screening programs costs taxpayer money through Medicare or subsidies. Costs could be significant over time as more people access screening.
Without full bill text, it's unclear how screening will be funded or implemented. Vague details make it hard to predict actual effects.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.