Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill creates accountability measures for government agencies accused of censoring speech.
The problem
Concerns that federal agencies may suppress or censor private speech without proper oversight or consequences for their actions.
The proposal
Establishes procedures requiring government agencies to disclose censorship activities and creates potential legal consequences for improper censorship.
The impact
Affects government agencies, social media platforms, and citizens regarding what speech government can regulate and how transparent agencies must be.
Requiring agencies to disclose censorship actions makes government activities more visible to the public and Congress. This allows citizens to know which agencies are censoring content and under what authority.
Creates legal accountability if agencies improperly suppress protected speech. Citizens and organizations would have grounds to challenge government censorship they believe violates First Amendment rights.
Knowing their actions may face legal scrutiny could discourage agencies from censoring speech beyond their legal authority. This helps maintain limits on executive power.
Requiring disclosure of all censorship activities could reveal law enforcement techniques, intelligence methods, or national security information that enemies could exploit.
The bill's actual text is unavailable, making it impossible to assess whether the legal standards are workable or could create confusion about what censorship is prohibited.
If the accountability mechanism is broad, government agencies may face constant lawsuits. This could increase costs and slow legitimate law enforcement activities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.