Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 61.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Erin Houchin (R-IN)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Protects rural broadband infrastructure and access in America's countryside.
The problem
Rural areas lack reliable high-speed internet access compared to cities. This limits education, business, and healthcare opportunities for rural communities.
The proposal
The bill establishes protections for rural broadband networks and likely increases funding or support for expanding internet service to underserved rural regions.
The impact
Rural residents, farmers, small businesses, and rural schools gain better internet access. Telecommunications companies operating in rural areas face new requirements or regulations.
Rural students, workers, and seniors gain access to online education, jobs, and services. This reduces inequality between rural and urban communities. Better connectivity supports economic growth in farming and small towns.
Farmers can use precision agriculture technology. Rural businesses can sell online and reach customers nationwide. Remote workers can move to rural areas, boosting local economies.
Rural residents access telehealth services and online medical care. Students attend virtual classes and access educational resources. Rural schools compete better academically with technology access.
Building rural broadband strengthens America's digital infrastructure. It positions the nation competitively in technology and innovation globally.
Building broadband infrastructure in rural areas is expensive due to long distances and low population density. Taxpayers may bear significant costs. Government funding may be limited or require new taxes.
New requirements may discourage internet companies from serving rural areas. Small telecom companies could struggle to comply. This might reduce competition and raise prices.
New regulations may give government too much control over private broadband companies. Private industry may argue they know best how to serve customers. This could limit innovation.
Protections without clear funding mechanisms may not solve rural broadband gaps long-term. Maintenance and upgrades require ongoing costs. Rural areas may still face service reliability issues.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.