Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to improve training programs for health career workers and track their outcomes.
The problem
Health career training programs lack consistent measurement of how well they prepare workers for jobs in healthcare fields.
The proposal
Establishes requirements to measure and report outcomes from health career training programs, including job placement and completion rates.
The impact
Health career students, training programs, employers, and healthcare workforce planning efforts will be affected by new tracking requirements.
Measuring outcomes helps identify which training programs work best. Programs can improve teaching methods based on data about student success. Students get better preparation for health careers.
Employers can see which training programs produce the best workers. This helps fill healthcare jobs faster. Better-trained workers mean better patient care.
Policymakers can fund training programs that actually work. Money goes to programs with proven success. Reduces waste of education resources.
Students can choose training programs based on real success data. They see which programs lead to good jobs. Better informed education choices.
Training programs must collect and report new data. This costs money and staff time. Smaller programs may struggle with compliance costs.
Programs might focus only on easily measured outcomes. Important skills like teamwork or communication are harder to track. Could narrow what programs actually teach.
Tracking student outcomes requires collecting personal employment data. This raises privacy questions about who sees this information. Data could be misused if not protected.
No funding mentioned for tracking systems or compliance. Programs may not know how to implement new requirements. Unclear deadlines and standards could cause confusion.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.