Latest action: Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Clarifies how law enforcement issues warrants in tribal territories and courts.
The problem
Confusion exists about which authorities can issue warrants on tribal lands and how tribal court systems handle warrant procedures, creating legal ambiguity.
The proposal
Establishes clear rules for how warrants are issued and executed in tribal jurisdictions, defining tribal court authority and coordination with federal/state law enforcement.
The impact
Tribal nations, law enforcement agencies, and people living or working on tribal lands gain clearer legal procedures for arrests and criminal investigations.
Recognizes tribal courts' authority to issue their own warrants. Gives tribal nations more control over law enforcement on their lands instead of depending on outside authorities.
Removes confusion about warrant procedures. Helps law enforcement, judges, and citizens understand which courts have power in different situations.
Communities can resolve criminal cases more quickly without waiting for outside authorities. Tribal courts gain resources and authority to act independently.
Establishes clear rules for how tribal, state, and federal police cooperate. Reduces legal conflicts between different authorities.
Different tribal nations may follow different warrant standards. Could create unequal legal treatment depending on location.
Tribal courts may need funding for training, staff, and systems to handle new warrant authority. Creates financial burden.
Less federal review of warrant decisions could allow abuse. Fewer checks on power in some tribal courts.
Law enforcement agencies must learn new procedures. Could cause temporary delays while adapting to new system.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.