Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Allows grants to Native American tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations for tourism development.
The problem
Native American and Native Hawaiian communities lack dedicated federal funding for developing tourism infrastructure and visitor experiences on tribal lands.
The proposal
Amends the Native American Tourism and Improving Visitor Experience Act to authorize federal grants to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and Native Hawaiian organizations for tourism projects.
The impact
Native American tribes, tribal organizations, and Native Hawaiian communities gain access to federal funding. Local economies near tribal lands may benefit from tourism growth.
Grants enable tribal nations to develop tourism businesses and attractions. This creates jobs and income for Native communities. Tourism revenue can support tribal governments and services.
Tribes control how tourism grants are used on their own lands. This respects tribal decision-making and allows communities to develop according to their values and priorities.
Tourism funding can support cultural centers, museums, and heritage sites. Communities can share Native history and traditions while generating revenue from visitors interested in authentic experiences.
Grants can fund visitor facilities, roads, and lodging on tribal lands. Better infrastructure attracts more tourists and supports long-term economic growth.
Increased tourism can harm natural habitats and sacred sites on tribal lands. Environmental degradation from visitor activity may outweigh economic benefits if not carefully managed.
Some tribes may lack capacity to apply for competitive grants. Smaller or less-resourced tribes might miss out on funding, increasing inequality between tribal nations.
Heavy tourism can pressure tribes to commercialize sacred traditions and change community life. Outside visitors may disrespect cultural practices or sacred sites.
The bill summary lacks specifics on grant amounts, eligibility requirements, or application processes. Without details, it is hard to assess fairness and effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.