Latest action: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-430, Part I.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Allows more active forest management and logging on federal lands to reduce wildfire risks.
The problem
Federal forests face increased wildfire dangers. Current regulations limit timber removal and forest management activities on public lands.
The proposal
Expands forest management practices on federal lands, streamlines permitting for timber sales, and reduces environmental review requirements for certain forestry projects.
The impact
Timber companies, rural communities, and environmental groups affected differently. Federal lands management practices change significantly.
Active forest management through thinning and controlled burns can reduce catastrophic wildfires. Healthier forests with fewer dead trees burn less intensely. This protects communities near federal forests.
Increased timber sales create jobs in logging, processing, and transportation. Rural communities depending on forest products gain economic opportunities. Local tax revenues and employment increase.
Streamlined permitting reduces bureaucratic delays for forest management projects. Companies can plan operations more efficiently. Projects that improve forest health get completed quicker.
Removing weak or diseased trees strengthens remaining forests. Better forest management can improve biodiversity and resilience. Thinned forests often grow faster and stronger.
Reduced environmental assessments may miss impacts on wildlife, water quality, or fragile ecosystems. Species protection laws might be weakened. Long-term ecological effects could be overlooked.
Increased logging can destroy wildlife habitats and old-growth forests. Some species depend on dense forest structures. Commercial interests might outweigh conservation needs.
Federal lands include tribal territories and sacred sites. Faster approval processes might bypass tribal consultation requirements. Native American voices could be excluded from decisions.
Overlogging now may reduce future timber availability and revenue. Forests need time to regenerate for sustainable harvest. Short-term profits could harm long-term economic stability.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.