Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 293.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
David Kustoff (R-TN)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Repeals two laws aimed at reducing incarceration and giving second chances to offenders.
The problem
The bill addresses concerns that prior incarceration reduction policies may have negatively affected public safety or criminal justice outcomes.
The proposal
Removes the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016 from federal law.
The impact
Affects criminal justice policy, incarcerated individuals, law enforcement, and communities involved in prisoner reentry programs.
Supporters may argue that repealing these laws refocuses criminal justice on public protection. They contend stricter policies deter crime and protect communities from recidivism.
Elimination of incarceration reduction programs could lower federal spending on reentry initiatives and support services. This may reduce budget requirements for criminal justice programs.
Repealing these acts may allow for more uniform, stringent sentencing policies. This could align criminal justice practices with deterrence-based approaches.
The repealed acts represented bipartisan efforts to reduce recidivism through rehabilitation. Removal could reverse progress in helping formerly incarcerated people reintegrate successfully.
Eliminating incarceration reduction policies typically increases prison populations and detention expenses. States and federal government would spend more on incarceration infrastructure and operations.
People currently in second-chance programs may lose access to job training, housing, and support services. This disrupts their path to employment and stability.
Repealing these laws removes structured pathways for formerly incarcerated individuals to find jobs and contribute to communities. This may increase long-term unemployment and social costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.