Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to increase federal support and resources for paternal involvement in child health and development.
The problem
Limited federal focus on fathers' roles in children's health outcomes. Current programs emphasize maternal health but not paternal engagement in pediatric care.
The proposal
Establishes grants and initiatives to promote father involvement in child healthcare, parenting education, and family wellness programs through federal health agencies.
The impact
Fathers, children, families, and healthcare providers gain resources and programs promoting male parental engagement in child health and development activities.
Research shows involved fathers improve children's cognitive and emotional development. This bill creates programs to help more fathers participate actively in healthcare decisions and parenting. It addresses a gap in current policy.
Father involvement correlates with better child health outcomes and reduced behavioral issues. Targeted grants can help reach underserved communities and improve overall population health metrics.
Recognizes men's important role in families and healthcare. Creates opportunities for male engagement in areas traditionally focused on mothers, promoting gender balance in family support programs.
Funds parenting education and health literacy programs specifically designed for fathers. Helps men understand nutrition, mental health, and pediatric care relevant to their children.
Requires federal funding for new grants and programs. May increase healthcare budgets without clear fiscal offsets. Could strain resources already allocated to existing maternal and child health initiatives.
Developing new federal programs takes time and requires coordination across agencies. Programs must reach intended audiences effectively to justify costs. May duplicate existing state or nonprofit initiatives.
Bill title and basic information suggest focus only on paternal involvement. May not address broader systemic healthcare barriers or socioeconomic factors affecting family health outcomes.
No official summary available. Unclear what specific programs, funding levels, or eligibility criteria the bill establishes. Difficult to assess actual effectiveness or fairness without full text.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.