Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to protect student privacy by restricting how schools collect and use student data.
The problem
Schools collect large amounts of student personal information. Concerns exist about how schools share and protect this data from misuse or unauthorized access.
The proposal
Limits student data collection to educational purposes only. Requires parental consent before sharing student information with third parties.
The impact
Students and families gain more control over personal information. Schools must change data practices. Tech companies lose some student data access.
Students and families would have more control over personal information collected by schools. Schools would need permission before sharing data with outside companies or organizations.
Stricter rules make it harder for companies to buy or use student information for advertising or other purposes not related to education. Families would know exactly how their data is used.
Parents gain more say in decisions about their child's data. Families can opt out of data sharing they don't support.
Clear privacy rules may help families feel more confident in school technology systems. Trust in schools could improve.
Schools must update systems and hire staff to follow new privacy rules. These costs could reduce money available for classrooms and teachers.
Some learning software requires sharing student data. Restrictions might prevent schools from using helpful technology for personalized learning.
Schools need to track consent forms and manage requests from families. This paperwork takes time away from education work.
Without official bill text available, schools may be confused about exactly what they must do. Different interpretations could create legal problems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2024 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.