Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This bill aims to prevent illegal fishing activities in U.S. waters and territories.
The problem
Illegal fishing depletes marine resources, harms domestic fishing industries, and violates international laws protecting ocean ecosystems and fish populations.
The proposal
The bill strengthens enforcement against illegal fishing through improved monitoring, penalties, and coordination with international partners to stop unauthorized fishing operations.
The impact
Fishing communities, marine ecosystems, coastal economies, and seafood consumers are affected through enforcement changes and potential impacts on fishing access and practices.
Reducing illegal fishing helps maintain healthy fish stocks. This ensures marine ecosystems remain balanced. Future fishing remains possible for legitimate operations.
Stops unfair competition from illegal operators. Legal fishing businesses can compete on equal footing. This protects jobs in fishing communities.
Better coordination with other nations addresses cross-border fishing violations. This improves global ocean resource management. Shared enforcement is more effective.
Enforcing fishing laws in U.S. waters asserts control over national resources. This prevents foreign vessels from exploiting American waters illegally.
Increased monitoring and patrols require significant federal spending. Taxpayers fund expanded coast guard and enforcement operations. Budget impacts may be substantial.
Stricter enforcement may create disputes with fishing nations. International partners might retaliate against U.S. trade or policy. Diplomatic complications could arise.
New rules may increase costs for legitimate fishing operations. Paperwork and monitoring requirements add expenses. Small fishing businesses face higher compliance costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.