Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal funding and programs for communities supporting recovery from substance abuse disorders.
The problem
Communities of Recovery programs help people overcome addiction and rebuild their lives. These programs need continued federal funding authorization to keep operating and serving people.
The proposal
The bill extends federal authorization and funding for Communities of Recovery initiatives that provide support services, peer mentoring, and resources to individuals recovering from substance use disorders.
The impact
People in recovery, their families, treatment providers, and community organizations benefit from continued program funding and services. Healthcare systems and local communities gain resources to address addiction.
Provides ongoing funding for peer support and mentoring programs that help people stay sober. These community-based programs have shown success in preventing relapse and supporting long-term recovery.
Prevention and recovery support programs cost less than emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and criminal justice involvement. Supporting recovery helps reduce overall healthcare expenses for individuals and communities.
Local organizations and peer networks become stronger when they have stable funding. This builds community infrastructure to address substance abuse as a public health issue.
Reauthorizing recovery programs addresses addiction from a public health perspective rather than only criminal justice. This approach has broad support across political lines.
Reauthorizing programs requires federal spending during a time of budget constraints. Some argue funds should be redirected to other priorities or that states should fund these programs instead.
Without seeing the full bill text, it's unclear how effective oversight and accountability measures are included. Program quality and outcomes tracking may vary across different communities.
Some argue states and local communities should manage substance abuse recovery funding rather than the federal government. This raises questions about appropriate government levels for program administration.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.