Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates programs to improve mental health services and support across America.
The problem
Many Americans lack access to mental health care. Costs are high. Services are often hard to find and use effectively.
The proposal
The bill establishes mental health programs, increases funding, improves access to services, and supports training for mental health workers.
The impact
Mental health patients, healthcare providers, and communities gain expanded services. Taxpayers fund increased government spending on mental health initiatives.
More funding for mental health services helps people in rural and underserved areas get treatment. This reduces wait times and makes help more available to those who need it.
Training programs for mental health professionals create jobs and improve quality of care. This helps address the shortage of psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors.
Better mental health support can reduce suicide rates, substance abuse, and emergency room visits. This improves overall community wellbeing and public safety.
Improved mental health reduces lost work productivity and healthcare costs. Healthier workers are more productive, which benefits employers and the economy.
The bill requires significant taxpayer funding for new mental health programs. This increases federal spending and may require budget cuts elsewhere or higher taxes.
Creating new programs takes time and resources. Coordination between federal, state, and local agencies can be complicated and slow.
Rapid expansion of services might lower quality if training and oversight are insufficient. Some programs may not be effective or evidence-based.
Changes to mental health coverage could affect insurance markets and premiums. Some people might see higher costs while others see benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.