Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires the 988 suicide prevention lifeline to improve cybersecurity protections.
The problem
The 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline handles sensitive personal health data. Cybersecurity breaches could expose vulnerable people's private information and disrupt critical mental health services.
The proposal
The bill establishes cybersecurity standards and requirements for the 988 lifeline operations to protect caller data and ensure service reliability.
The impact
Suicide prevention counselors, callers in crisis, mental health organizations, and technology providers must meet new security standards for handling confidential health information.
People calling the 988 lifeline are in crisis and share deeply personal information. Better cybersecurity protects their privacy and prevents criminals from stealing their sensitive health data.
Cybersecurity requirements help prevent hacking attacks that could disrupt the lifeline during emergencies. This keeps the service available when people need it most.
The bill creates uniform security requirements across the 988 network. This provides clarity about what organizations must do to protect data.
Strong cybersecurity measures encourage more people to use the lifeline confidently. People are more likely to call if they know their information is safe.
Organizations operating the 988 lifeline may need expensive new technology, staff training, and security audits. Smaller organizations could struggle with these costs.
Adding new security requirements could slow down how quickly calls are handled initially. Extra verification steps might delay crisis counselors reaching callers.
Without detailed definitions in the bill summary, organizations may be confused about exactly what cybersecurity measures are required or how to comply.
New government requirements increase paperwork and compliance obligations for organizations already struggling with limited budgets and staff.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.