Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires the 988 suicide helpline to meet cybersecurity standards and protect caller data.
The problem
The 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline handles sensitive personal information from vulnerable people. Weak cybersecurity could expose private data or disrupt emergency services when people need help most.
The proposal
The bill establishes cybersecurity requirements for the 988 lifeline, including data protection standards, breach notification rules, and security audits to safeguard caller information.
The impact
Suicide prevention workers, callers in crisis, and healthcare organizations using 988 would benefit from stronger data protection and more reliable emergency service operations.
People calling 988 share deeply personal struggles. Strong cybersecurity rules ensure their private information stays confidential and cannot be stolen or misused by bad actors.
Cyberattacks could disable the 988 system when someone desperately needs help. Security requirements make it harder for hackers to disrupt this life-saving service.
Establishes specific cybersecurity rules that 988 providers must follow. This gives organizations clear guidance on what data protection looks like.
Notification requirements mean if data is stolen, people find out quickly so they can protect themselves from identity theft or privacy violations.
Upgrading cybersecurity systems, hiring security experts, and conducting audits costs significant money. Smaller crisis centers may struggle to afford these requirements.
Resources spent on cybersecurity compliance could have gone to hiring more counselors or expanding services to help more people in crisis.
Without knowing exactly how rules will be enforced or what penalties exist, organizations might be confused about compliance expectations and deadlines.
Complex cybersecurity requirements and frequent audits could create paperwork headaches that distract from the main mission of helping people in crisis.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.