Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 428.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Settles water rights between Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo and the Rio Chama in New Mexico.
The problem
Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo has disputed water rights claims on the Rio Chama. The tribe needs a legal settlement to secure reliable water for their community and land.
The proposal
The bill recognizes and settles Ohkay Owingeh's water rights to the Rio Chama. It establishes how much water the tribe can use and resolves past disputes.
The impact
Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo gains guaranteed water access. Other water users in the region may face changes to their water allocations.
Ohkay Owingeh gains legally protected water rights for drinking, agriculture, and community needs. This ends uncertainty about water availability and supports tribal self-determination and economic development.
A settlement resolves long-standing disputes and avoids costly court battles. Clear water rights allow all parties to plan future water use more effectively.
Settling water disputes can reduce conflict between the tribe and neighboring water users. This promotes peaceful cooperation in managing the Rio Chama watershed.
Secured water rights enable Ohkay Owingeh to pursue farming, ranching, and other water-dependent industries. This supports job creation and tribal revenue.
Neighboring ranchers, farmers, and communities may receive less water than before. This could reduce their agricultural productivity and economic opportunities.
The settlement may require federal funding for infrastructure or payments to affected parties. Taxpayers bear the cost of resolving the dispute.
Redistributing water could affect stream flows, fish populations, and ecosystems in the Rio Chama. Long-term environmental impacts may be unclear.
Without an official bill summary, the exact water amounts and terms remain unclear. The specific impacts on all parties are difficult to assess.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.