Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 429.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Settles water rights disputes between the Zuni Indian Tribe and the federal government.
The problem
The Zuni Indian Tribe has unresolved water rights claims affecting their reservation and access to water resources for agriculture, drinking, and community needs.
The proposal
Establishes a legal agreement recognizing Zuni water rights, allocating specific water amounts, and providing federal funding for water infrastructure projects on Zuni lands.
The impact
Zuni Tribe gains secure water access and funding. New Mexico and other states' water allocations may be affected. Federal government commits resources to implementation.
Ends decades of uncertainty about Zuni water rights. Provides legal clarity and stability for the tribe's future planning. Prevents costly litigation.
Federal funding enables water system improvements on Zuni lands. Upgrades drinking water quality and irrigation systems. Supports agricultural and economic development.
Recognizes tribal self-governance and resource control. Strengthens Zuni Tribe's ability to manage lands and economy independently. Honors treaty obligations.
Creates predictable water allocation framework for all parties. Reduces future conflicts between tribes, states, and federal government. Enables cooperative resource management.
Water allocated to Zuni comes from shared sources. New Mexico or downstream states could receive less water. May affect farmers and communities relying on current allocations.
Federal government funds infrastructure projects and ongoing commitments. Taxpayers pay for settlement implementation. Budget priorities may be affected.
Building new water infrastructure is difficult and time-consuming. Disputes may arise during implementation. Coordination between multiple agencies required.
Other tribes may pursue similar settlements. Could lead to multiple future claims. Expands federal liability for water rights disputes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.