Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires federal buildings to use mass timber in construction and renovation projects.
The problem
Federal buildings typically use concrete and steel. Mass timber is a renewable material that could reduce emissions and support forestry industries while meeting construction needs.
The proposal
The bill directs federal agencies to use mass timber in new federal building projects and major renovations where feasible and cost-effective.
The impact
Federal construction workers, timber producers, and environmental advocates are affected. Building costs may change. Forest management practices could expand. Government construction timelines may shift.
Mass timber stores carbon and produces fewer emissions than concrete and steel during manufacturing. This helps the federal government meet climate goals and reduce environmental impact.
Increased demand for mass timber could create jobs in forestry, manufacturing, and construction. This supports rural economies and the timber industry.
Mass timber comes from managed forests that can be replanted. Using renewable materials reduces dependence on concrete and steel mining.
Federal buildings using mass timber could encourage private companies and other governments to adopt the material, spreading environmental benefits.
Mass timber construction may be more expensive than traditional methods in some regions. Taxpayers could face higher building costs if mass timber isn't cost-competitive.
Mass timber production capacity is still developing. The requirement could strain supply, delay projects, or force government to use imported materials.
Mass timber in large buildings is still relatively new in the U.S. Long-term durability, fire safety, and structural performance need more real-world testing.
While mass timber works in small projects, using it for major federal buildings is unproven. Construction delays or failures could waste taxpayer money.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.