Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 617.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Transfers federal land management responsibility in California to another agency or entity.
The problem
Federal lands in California may need different management approaches. Current administrative jurisdiction may not serve state interests or land use goals effectively.
The proposal
The bill transfers administrative control of certain federal lands in California from one federal entity to another, changing how these lands are managed and overseen.
The impact
California residents, federal agencies, land users, and environmental groups are affected. Changes to land management, access, and conservation practices may follow.
Transferring jurisdiction could give California more say in how lands are managed. State officials may better understand local needs and priorities.
Consolidating management under one entity might reduce bureaucratic delays. Faster approval of projects and land-use decisions could result.
The receiving agency might specialize in land management suited to California conditions. This could improve efficiency and outcomes.
Changing management could weaken conservation protections on federal lands. Environmental groups worry about increased development or resource extraction.
Federal management ensures consistent nationwide environmental standards. Transfer might eliminate important federal protections and coordination.
Land transfers could restrict public access to recreation and hunting areas. Some communities may lose traditional use rights.
Transferring lands requires funding, staff, and infrastructure changes. Costs to federal and state budgets are unclear.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.