Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians to buy back historic lands.
The problem
The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians historically lost lands over time. This bill addresses efforts to reacquire culturally and historically significant property.
The proposal
The bill enables the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians to reacquire historic lands, likely through federal support or modified procedures for land acquisition and trust status.
The impact
Affects the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, federal land management, and local communities where historic Cherokee lands are located.
Allows the Eastern Band of Cherokee to recover lands with cultural and historical significance to their nation. This supports tribal sovereignty and self-determination.
Tribal land ownership can support economic development through gaming, tourism, and resource management. This creates revenue for tribal services and employment.
Reacquiring historic lands partially addresses past injustices and dispossession of Native American territories. Supports reconciliation between federal government and tribes.
Land ownership strengthens tribal authority to govern and manage resources according to tribal law and traditions.
Reacquisition may require federal funding or land purchases, creating government expenses. Long-term trust management costs could burden federal budgets.
If lands are privately owned, reacquisition could affect current landowners' rights. This may create disputes or require large compensation payments.
Tribal lands in trust status are often exempt from state and local property taxes. This reduces tax revenue for counties and municipalities.
Identifying historic lands, determining eligible properties, and managing acquisitions requires substantial administrative processes and legal clarity.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.