Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to protect academic honesty in schools and universities.
The problem
Academic dishonesty like cheating and plagiarism may be increasing. Schools need clearer rules and consequences.
The proposal
Bill would establish standards for academic integrity policies. It may require reporting systems and penalties for violations.
The impact
Students, teachers, and schools must follow new academic honesty rules. Cheating could have stricter punishments.
Clear rules help honest students compete fairly. Students who work hard won't lose to cheaters. Schools become more trustworthy places to learn.
Stricter standards mean diplomas mean more. Employers trust graduates actually learned the material. Academic credentials become more meaningful.
Uniform rules across schools create fairness. Students transferring schools face consistent policies. Everyone knows what's expected.
Students must do their own work to succeed. Learning happens through effort and struggle. Critical thinking skills develop better.
Harsh penalties might hurt students' futures unfairly. One mistake could destroy college prospects. Young people deserve second chances.
Schools need new reporting systems and processes. Hiring staff to manage violations costs money. Schools already have tight budgets.
Without details, schools may enforce rules differently. What counts as cheating might be confusing. Students could face unfair treatment.
Students needing help might avoid asking questions. Fear of punishment could prevent learning. Those already behind fall further behind.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.