Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes to establish Rock Creek as a national park in the United States.
The problem
Rock Creek area lacks formal national park protection status and comprehensive management structure to preserve its natural and cultural resources.
The proposal
Designates Rock Creek as a national park, establishing federal management, protection standards, and administrative framework for the designated area.
The impact
Affects local communities, visitors, land managers, and conservation efforts in the Rock Creek region through new federal oversight and recreational access policies.
National park status provides stronger legal protections for ecosystems, wildlife, and natural features. Dedicated management resources ensure long-term preservation of the area's environmental values.
National park designation typically attracts more visitors, boosting local economies through lodging, dining, and retail spending. Communities near parks often see increased business activity and job creation.
Federal park status guarantees public access to outdoor recreation areas including hiking, camping, and nature study. Creates opportunities for education and wellness activities.
National park management typically includes protection of historical and cultural sites. Ensures these resources are preserved for future generations with appropriate interpretation.
National park designation limits private property rights and local control over land use decisions. Restrictions may prevent development, farming, or other activities previously permitted.
Creating a new national park requires ongoing federal funding for staffing, maintenance, and operations. Budget impacts affect federal spending priorities and deficit considerations.
Park establishment may affect current residents or property owners through land acquisition or use changes. Communities may experience social disruption or reduced economic independence.
Federal management adds administrative complexity and may slow local decision-making. Park regulations could create conflicts between conservation goals and community needs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.