Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to create a national program addressing diabetes prevention and treatment.
The problem
Diabetes affects millions of Americans, causing serious health complications and high healthcare costs. Better prevention and treatment programs are needed nationwide.
The proposal
Establishes a National Diabetes Project to coordinate prevention, research, and treatment efforts across federal agencies and healthcare providers.
The impact
People with diabetes, at-risk populations, healthcare providers, and federal health budgets would be affected by new programs and funding.
A coordinated national program could help more people prevent diabetes through education and early detection. This might reduce serious health problems later.
New federal funding for diabetes research could lead to better treatments and possible cures. Scientists could work together more effectively.
Preventing diabetes is cheaper than treating it. Better prevention programs could save money for patients and the healthcare system overall.
A national project would collect better information about diabetes across the country. This helps officials understand the problem and track progress.
Creating a new national program requires taxpayer money. The bill does not specify how much it will cost or how it will be funded.
Federal programs sometimes have overlapping efforts or waste. It is unclear if a new national project will work better than existing programs.
Without an official summary, it is hard to know exactly what the bill does or what results it expects to achieve.
New federal programs might duplicate work already done by states or local health agencies, creating confusion or reducing their funding.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.