Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
HR 9155 establishes consent requirements for crime and law enforcement procedures.
The problem
Current law enforcement practices may lack clear consent standards. This creates inconsistency in how officers obtain permission for searches or other procedures.
The proposal
The bill requires law enforcement to obtain explicit consent before conducting certain searches or procedures. It establishes clear standards and documentation requirements.
The impact
Law enforcement agencies must follow new procedures. Citizens gain protections regarding searches. Courts may handle more consent-related cases.
Clear consent rules help protect people from unauthorized searches or procedures. Citizens know their rights and when police need permission. This strengthens Fourth Amendment protections.
Written consent requirements create clear documentation. This reduces arguments in court about whether permission was actually given. Both police and citizens have protection.
Clear standards help officers know exactly what to do. This creates consistency across departments and reduces confusion about proper conduct.
Transparent consent procedures may help people trust law enforcement more. Clear rules show respect for citizen rights and proper authority limits.
Requiring explicit consent and documentation takes time. Police may face delays investigating crimes or responding to emergencies. This could affect response times.
Police departments must train officers on new procedures and maintain records. This costs money and requires administrative resources that departments may lack.
The bill lacks a detailed summary, making it unclear how violations are punished. Penalties, exceptions, and implementation details are unknown.
If criminals can refuse consent and police cannot proceed, some investigations may stall. This could reduce law enforcement effectiveness in serious cases.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.